Saved Kalshi settlement results
These are market contract results, not election calls or vote totals. News, polls, prices and charts remain as captured.
Observation saved Nov 4, 2026, 11:35 AM UTC. No automatic updates.
Will Robert Jarosh be retained on the Wyoming Supreme Court?
No verified final result is available for the selected contract.
Settlement pending
IncumbentRobert Jarosh
IncumbentRobert Jarosh
Will Robert Jarosh be retained on the Wyoming Supreme Court?
$564.37
NOV 7, 2026
General Election
Voters choose the office holder.
Saved odds — Will Robert Jarosh be retained on the Wyoming Supreme Court?
Prediction-market probability saved with this edition; no automatic updates.
91%chance to win
$564.37NOV 7, 2026Candidate Overview
Key details about the candidate’s background, party, office sought and current campaign.
Current roleJudge
Political ideologyNonpartisan
Age55 years old (Jan 13, 1971)
GenderMale
LocationWyoming
Show moreShow less
BackgroundAttorney
EducationUniversity of Wyoming — B.S. (1993)
Notable personal detailsRobert Carl Jarosh is an American lawyer and Wyoming Supreme Court justice. He was appointed to the Wyoming Supreme Court by Governor Mark Gordon and assumed office on 2024-03-27. Before joining the court, he practiced law in Cheyenne with Hirst Applegate, LLP and previously worked with Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells) in Denver, and he also served as a law clerk to U.S. Magistrate Judge William C. Beaman.
SourcesShowHide
Political Positions
Healthcare
Robert Jarosh joined the Wyoming Supreme Court decision that held Wyoming residents have a constitutional right to make their own health care decisions, including the decision whether to terminate or continue a pregnancy. That record aligns with a broader view of protecting access to medical decision-making rather than limiting it through state bans.
Abortion & Reproductive Rights
Robert Jarosh joined the Wyoming Supreme Court majority that struck down Wyoming’s 2023 abortion restrictions and medication-abortion ban as unconstitutional under the state constitution. The court held that the decision whether to terminate or continue a pregnancy is protected as a woman’s own health care decision, while also recognizing that the constitution may allow reasonable and necessary restrictions.
Not available in this saved edition
These sections were unavailable when this edition was saved. No automatic updates.
- News
- Polls
- Endorsements
- Fundraising